The Churchill Community Coalition
Find us on...
  • Home
  • CCC News
    • CCC Events Calendar >
      • Trending News
  • RESOURCES
  • About Us
    • Contact
    • Get Involved
    • Employment
    • Membership
    • Pictures >
      • 2016 5k Color Blast Walk/Run Race Results & Finish Line Photos
      • 2015 Color Blast 5k Results/Pictures
  • Alcohol
  • Marijuana Information
    • Nevada Marijuana Laws
    • Marijuana And The Brain
    • TEENS & Marijuana
    • How To Talk How Your Kids About Marijuana
    • Medical Marijuana
    • The Environmental Effects
    • Edibles
    • Synthetic Marijuana
    • The Many Faces Of Marijuana
  • Nevada Marijuana Initiative
  • Marijuana: MYTH vs FACT
  • Suicide Resources
  • Health & Wellness
  • Tobacco
    • Fallon Smoke-Free Businesses
  • Prescription Drugs
  • For Parents
    • Churchill County Parent Connect
  • Teen ZONE
  • Students Taking On Prevention (S.T.O.P.)
    • S.T.O.P NEWS
    • S.T.O.P. CALENDAR
  • Community Trends (Local Data)
  • Español
    • Marihuana
  • Documents, Resources & References
    • Community Resource Website
    • CCC Public Service Announcements
    • Coalition Projects >
      • Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention Project
    • Helpful Links
    • Local Resources
  • 2017 Color Blast Registration
  • Walk in Memory/Walk for Hope

Dangerous Pesticides Are Being Found In Colorado’s Weed

1/13/2016

0 Comments

 
THE STATE DOESN'T YET REQUIRE MARIJUANA BUSINESSES TO CONDUCT PESTICIDE TESTING, LEADING TO A "BUYER BEWARE" MARKET.

Link to the article: 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/colorado-marijuana-pesticides_5655fcf4e4b079b28189fb8c

By:

Andy Campbell Reporter, The Huffington Post

​
Colorado's agricultural agencies are in panic mode after several independent studies found dangerous levels of pesticides in marijuana products.
A CNN report published Wednesday found that at least one over-the-counter product tested positive for illegally high levels of the neurotoxin imidacloprid. CNN commissioned tests by an independent lab, and the report ultimately led to a recall of 2,362 pot products. A similar Denver Post study in September yielded similar findings -- some of the cannabis products tested had as much as six times the federally allowed limit on pesticides in consumable products.
If the pesticides had been found on, say, avocados, the products would have been taken off the shelves immediately. But Colorado's oversight of pesticides on marijuana has been limited, other than a handful of recalls and plant quarantines.
Colorado and other states that recently legalized marijuana are just beginning to grapple with the pesticide issue. An absence of federal regulation has left the states struggling to figure out how to pass pesticide legislation, how to enforce it and which agencies should be doing the enforcing.

MAHALA GAYLORD VIA GETTY IMAGES
Gobi Analytical is the only lab in Denver that is approved to test cannabis for pesticides. This sample of a cannabis infused edible is at the beginning of the preparation process to undergo pesticide testing.Marijuana businesses in Colorado are not required to conduct pesticide testing before products hit the shelves, nor does the state conduct random testing after the items are already on the market. The federal Environmental Protection Agency, which usually regulates pesticides, doesn't have oversight because the federal government still lists marijuana as an illegal Schedule I drug. That has led to confusion over which pesticides can be used and in what amounts, CNN notes.
The ambiguity has left marijuana businesses and growers with the burden of self-regulating by taking their own products to state-licensed labs and getting them tested for potency and pesticides. Larry Wolk, executive director of the Colorado Department of Health and Environment, called it a "buyer beware" market, in which it's up to consumers and local businesses to vet products. However, Wolk noted that multiple state agencies are working to fix the situation.
Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper (D) issued an executive order earlier this month giving agencies the power to keep products off the shelves and destroy them if they contain pesticide levels above what's approved by the EPA. Before the order, those products could end up back on the market.
"When a pesticide is applied to a crop in a manner that is inconsistent with the pesticide's label, and the crop is contaminated by that pesticide, it constitutes a threat to the public safety," Hickenlooper's order states.
It's a step in the right direction, but it still doesn't require businesses to test for pesticides in the first place. Wolk said it'll still be at least six months before the state can work out pesticide labeling that would help consumers easily identify state-approved products.
The Denver Post reported that the state is also trying to pass legislation that would stop the use of illegal pesticides before they even make contact with a crop:
The state is amid rulemaking that would strictly limit the pesticides that can be used on marijuana only to those whose labels allow for unspecified crops; that can be used in greenhouses; and that are not prohibited from human consumption. Pesticides allowed in tobacco cultivation also would be approved.
In Oregon, another state that recently legalized marijuana, new rules starting next year will require marijuana products to be screened for 60 pesticides, while testing labs will have to be accredited by the state, The Oregonian reports.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

If you or someone you know may be having an overdose please
call 911 immediately
OR Contact the
Overdose Hotline- 
1-800-222-1222

Home

About

CCCNEWS

Membership

Contact

The Churchill Community Coalition is Located in the Old Post Office at 90. N. Maine St.
We are open Monday through Friday and closed on federal and state holidays. 
If you need to contact our office Please Call (775) 423-7433
This publication was supported in whole or in part by the Nevada Division of Public and Behavioral Health, Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Agency (SAPTA) through State General Funds and/or the SAPT Block Grant for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).  Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. DHHS, SAMHSA, or the State of Nevada.
Copyright © 2015